Frequently Asked Questions

Quorn is classified as a safe, well-tolerated food by regulatory bodies across the world, including the USA's Food & Drug Administration (FDA), and the UK's Food Standards Agency (FSA), among the world's most stringent food safety regulators.

Our products have been eaten for more than 33 years with over 5 billion Quorn meals now served. All Quorn products are classified as safe, well-tolerated food by the world’s most stringent food safety regulators, including the USA's Food & Drug Administration (FDA), and the UK's Food Standards Agency (FSA). But it’s important to know that Quorn products are a source of protein—and since all proteins can be allergenic or cause intolerance to some—consumers should be mindful of their personal sensitivities when introducing Quorn into their diet. That’s why, following consumer feedback, we updated our packaging to explain possible sensitivities some may have when eating Quorn, despite reactions to Quorn products being significantly less common than foods such as soy, nuts and shellfish. The UK Food Standards Agency states that “between 1 in 100,000 to 200,000 people will react” or be intolerant to Quorn products. By comparison, one in 200 people are thought to be intolerant to soy. And these facts are supported by the millions of people around the world who safely enjoy Quorn’s great taste and nutritional benefits every day.

Absolutely.

Quorn first went on sale in UK in 1985, and has since served over 5 billion meals across 20 different countries. Quorn has been approved for sale by some of the world’s leading health agencies, including the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA), Health Canada (HC), European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), UK Food Standards Agency (FSA) and Food Safety Australia New Zealand (FSANZ). So it’s not just us, but also the world’s leading food regulators who are confident that it is safe.

No it is not, and this is backed up by CSPI’s own data.

CSPI has been relentless in misleading the public on this point since 2002, and unsurprisingly has received no support from the scientific and nutritional communities. Unsurprising because Quorn has sold over 5 billion servings since launching in 1985, and so it would be very evident for healthcare professional and indeed consumers if CSPI claim was even vaguely true.

CSPI set up a website in 2002 to gather instances of allergic reactions to Quorn, and 312 were reported in the following 16 years. This pretty matches the data we gather via the Quorn Foods Consumer Services team, and represents approximately one allergic reaction in every 24 million servings of Quorn. Presenting at the American Society for Nutrition annual conference, June 2018, Dr Steve Taylor, Co-Founder and Co-Director of the Food Allergy Research and Resource Program at The Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, stated “Quorn is, in my expert opinion, safer than many other sources of protein on the basis of very low prevalence of allergic reaction complaints.”

CSPI has also been caught out misrepresenting the findings of its own research firm to promote their completely unfounded assertion about Quorn:

• TNS Intersearch – a highly regarded global research firm hired by CSPI in 2003 to gather public opinion data about allergic reactions to Quorn and other foods – stated its results had been “represented inaccurately” by CSPI.
• In a sharply worded letter to CSPI, TNS stated CSPI’s characterizations did “not accurately reflect the findings of [its] research.”
• TNS noted the data it compiled on Quorn was based on a sample purely of Quorn eaters. But CSPI incorrectly publicized them based on a sample of the general population. In doing so, CSPI irresponsibly inflated the statistics and created the false impression of a substantially higher allergenic response for Quorn products.
• TNS’s letter noted that CSPI’s press release headline was “factually incorrect,” and scolded CSPI’s Founder, Michael Jacobson, stating “[Y]ou were, clearly, not comparing like for like data” and that TNS did “not endorse the statements made by you. …”. Click here to read the letter from TNS.

We are clear in stating those who may be sensitive to high-protein foods may be intolerant to Quorn, and there are very rare instances of allergic reaction. But Quorn foods are proven to be far less allergenic than shellfish, nuts, soy and dairy. To suggest, as CSPI does, that Quorn products are highly allergenic is both irresponsible and deceptive.

No, it did not. The Centre for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has promoted a 2015 lawsuit filed in California that contains false and unfounded allegations about Quorn products in connection with the tragic passing of Miles Bengco. In the complaint, attorneys representing Miles’ family omit and actively downplay several key facts addressing the true cause of this unfortunate event. Specifically:

• The autopsy concluded, after a lengthy investigation, that Miles died from a severe asthma attack at a time when his lungs were in a very weak state.
• The autopsy actively looked for and found no evidence of an allergic reaction and anaphylactic attack.
• Miles suffered from “poorly-controlled” asthma, a condition so severe that it caused him to be hospitalized on at least ten separate occasions throughout his young life—all prior to the attack that wound up claiming his life.
• Miles had not been receiving any of his asthma maintenance medications to keep his condition reasonably under control one month prior to his death, and was placed on an “organic diet” in lieu of medicine.
• Attorneys representing the family are now attempting to ameliorate this tragedy by way of a misguided lawsuit against Quorn.